brother down
Amiri Baraka has once again managed to put himself at the centre of controversy with his poetry.
In a perverse way, part of me has to respect this. Baraka has managed to do something provocative with a poet-laureate post that's usually expected to tame its holders. He's managed to put poetry into the public debate in a way few poets can, and to make poetry
dangerous, something to be censored rather than ignored. Many of those who believe poetry should also be propaganda for a cause would be, frankly, thrilled by the kind of attention Baraka is getting.
It's too bad the thinking, and the poetry, at the heart of all this just isn't that impressive. I've always been in awe of Baraka's capacity for pyrotechnics, but I've never been able to relate to his earlier Black nationalism or his latter-day Marxism -- other poets and writers have been down those roads with much more intellectual substance and much more interesting results.
The offending
poem feels uncomfortably like a weary retread of Baraka's glory days. This is controversial work (albeit almost a year late), but it really doesn't
deserve to be. Baraka's target is vague, his posture easily admits the accusation of lunacy -- or of simply being stuck in the Sixties, which some would say is the same thing -- and his approach is overblown, likely to alienate all but the converted.
I'm not one of those who thinks poetry should necessarily be propaganda or easily reducible to "social commentary," but those things can be done with poetry, and much better than this. Give me
Erica Hunt,
Harryette Mullen or
Dionne Brand any day.